Subject: | [OM] Re: Tokina AT-X 50-250 vs. OM 85-250 |
---|---|
From: | Fernando Gonzalez Gentile <fgnzalez@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Sun, 23 May 2004 20:28:40 -0300 |
on 23/05/2004 19:06, ClassicVW@xxxxxxx at ClassicVW@xxxxxxx wrote: > With your lenses > you already have 135 and 300 covered, so, maybe a simple 200 will do it for > your needs? Quite agree. And you could add some extension tubes, which fit the 200 well. /F. The olympus mailinglist olympus@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: mailto:olympus-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe To contact the list admins: mailto:olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx?subject="Olympus List Problem" |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [OM] Tamron 2x flat field converter, Mike |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [OM] Re: Some more E-1, 10D and Zuiko Digital Comparison, W Shumaker |
Previous by Thread: | [OM] Re: Tokina AT-X 50-250 vs. OM 85-250, ClassicVW |
Next by Thread: | [OM] Re: Tokina AT-X 50-250 vs. OM 85-250, Mike |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |