Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

[OM] Re: Save Kodachrome Day

Subject: [OM] Re: Save Kodachrome Day
From: Philippe Le Zuikomane <zuikomane@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 15 May 2004 10:36:32 -0500
I know this sounds insane (newbie alert), but what is there in principle that 
prevents the formation of a photographers' nonprofit organization to take over 
corporate assets that non longer generate profits?

If we really want to keep Grand Old Technology alive, isn't that something that 
could be pursued to some extent?

And on the legal front, shouldn't intellectual property laws be amended so as 
to forbid entities that have been selling technology from negating the usage 
value of said technology by withdrawing products from the market, withdrawing 
technical support and availability of parts, while retaining the intellectual 
property connected to the discontinued technology?

There is no such thing as forced obsolescence of a Stradivarius. But there is a 
colossal amount of forced obsolescence which is underpinned in great part by 
existing intellectual property laws.

{Phil}


==
The olympus mailinglist olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: mailto:olympus-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe

To contact the list admins: mailto:olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx?subject="Olympus 
List Problem"
        

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz