Am I making any sense, or could one argue that switching between types and
brands of film is tantamount to operating with a variety of opto-chemical
sensors? I would feel a little limited by one sensor in a camera body. {Phil}
On 7:21 AM, Chris Barker wrote:
>Sam
>
>I agree with your idea of the element of surprise. It might sound
>daft to say that film gives you the chance to wait ... and then be
>surprised at the quality of the composition/light/expression etc...,
>when you could see it straight away on a computer screen, but that
>aspect of film is pleasurable. Digital gives you a ream of photos
>in a short time and is clearly useful for professionals. I am able
>to resist for 2 main reasons: I cannot afford a gizmo that will
>depreciate in such a short time by so much; and I hate electronic
>viewfinders.
>
>Chris
==
The olympus mailinglist olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: mailto:olympus-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
To contact the list admins: mailto:olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx?subject="Olympus
List Problem"
|