I believe I understand the point of the exercise and the choice/nature
of the images. Doesn't much impress me, but it is conceptually
understandable.
Now tell me. Is the site design an intentional 'in your face' statement
too? Sites that require jumping back to the index page to go on to the
next image are deeply annoying. The flow of the images would seem to be
part of these exercises, but the way the site works completely destroys
any flow. Intentional? lazy? ?? Needless to say, I didn't look at all
the full size images. They would have to be much more in line with my
personal esthetic sense to go to all that bother.
Moose
afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>Kyle Cassidy is the guy -........
>The 'way to work' series was not intended to be fine photography -
>rather fun, 'in your face' images. The M7 was a great tease too.
>See his real work and humour here.
>AndrewF
>
>
>On 12/05/2004, at 4:43 PM, Gordon J. Ross wrote:
>
>
>
>>Out of focus, blurred, rendomly framed shots could be defended as 'art' if
>>they express or draw out some response or emotion, the 12 shots did
>>not do that for me.
>>
>>Gord
>>
>>
The olympus mailinglist olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: mailto:olympus-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
To contact the list admins: mailto:olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx?subject="Olympus
List Problem"
|