> If it cheers you up, I'll agree with you. No good photograph can be taken
> without fast autofocus. No good portrait can be taken without fast
> autofocus. No good portrait can be taken, under time pressure, without
> fast autofocus.
Why did you buy an Olympus IS3000?????
> Look. It would be tedious to debate this. If you want to believe it, it's
> a free internet. But your asserting it doesn't make it so.
You are right! This is an OM system community and I suppose I cannot
write in it. Thank very much for your explanations.
Best regards,
Dave
----- Original Message -----
From: "Donald MacDonald" <d1956m198d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, May 05, 2004 4:51 PM
Subject: [OM] Re: Some of my last OM photos :-(
>
> On Wed, 5 May 2004 16:18:28 +0200, David Irisarri
> <div2000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> >
> > Snipped (oh, brother!)
> >
>
> Look. It would be tedious to debate this. If you want to believe it, it's
> a free internet. But your asserting it doesn't make it so.
>
> If it cheers you up, I'll agree with you. No good photograph can be taken
> without fast autofocus. No good portrait can be taken without fast
> autofocus. No good portrait can be taken, under time pressure, without
> fast autofocus.
>
> There. Can I uncross my fingers now?
>
> Just how recently was autofocus introduced?
>
> No good photographs were produced before then?
>
> None since, using manual focus?
>
> Jane Bown (uses OMs) has never taken a good portrait, under time pressure?
> Nobody else?
>
> Sheesh. Get lost.
>
> D
>
>
> --
> Donald Neil MacDonald BA DipLIS
> www.skelpitheid.com
>
> The olympus mailinglist olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
> To unsubscribe: mailto:olympus-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
>
> To contact the list admins:
mailto:olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx?subject="Olympus List Problem"
>
>
>
The olympus mailinglist olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: mailto:olympus-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
To contact the list admins: mailto:olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx?subject="Olympus
List Problem"
|