The 357 measures 11.6 Diameter, 5.4 High
The 386 measures 11.6 Diameter, 4.2 High
The only difference is a 1.2 mm of thickness. Probably not enough to make a
difference as the cell is contacted by a spring in the battery compartment.
That's my final answer,
GeoW
On 3 May 2004 at 20:22, Moose wrote:
>
> rdk@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>
> >The C.R.I.S.S (MR-9) adapter works for me in an OM-1 so the adapter
> >may be faulty. Note that in Europe www.rolleicamera.com (in the UK)
> >is probably the cheapest source of MR-9 adapters (no customs duty and
> >cheaper postage).
> >
> >SR44 (preferably SR44W) should work OK.
> >
> No. The SR44 is not the correct battery for the newer versions of the
> MR-9. See my treatise yesterday. Really too bad C.R.I.S. didn't rename
> the adapter when they changed the construction.
>
> >Alternatively, read
> >
> >www.ihagee.org/batt-adapt-us.pdf
> >
> Note that this reference also says some adapters take SR44/357 and
> some take 386 cells.
>
> >Roger Key
> >
> >
The olympus mailinglist olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: mailto:olympus-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
To contact the list admins: mailto:olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx?subject="Olympus
List Problem"
|