50/2 = a shorter working distance, more DOF, and a fast portrait lens. Right
now, after more thinking, it's low down on my list after a 50-200 Zuiko
Digital. I may try a 50/3.5 Zuiko macro this weekend.
Skip
>
>Subject: [OM] ( OM) OM macro analogue lenses on Digital
> From: "Brian Swale" <bj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2004 15:29:06 +1200
> To: om2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>Hi All,
>Skip wrote
>> More E-1 shots, this time with the Zuiko 90/2 Macro.
>>
>> http://skipwilliams.smugmug.com/gallery/103957/1/3666893
>>
>> All shots from a tripod, natural light, f/2.0 or f/5.6 (see caption above
>each picture)
>>
>> In short, it works very nicely and I may just hunt for a 50/2 Zuiko
>instead of buyin a 50/2 Digital Zuiko.
>>
>> Skip
>
>Question Skip, what would you expect to get from the 50/2 that you don't
>get from the 90/2 ??
>
>Brian
>
>The olympus mailinglist olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
>To unsubscribe: mailto:olympus-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
>
>To contact the list admins: mailto:olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx?subject="Olympus
>List Problem"
>
The olympus mailinglist olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: mailto:olympus-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
To contact the list admins: mailto:olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx?subject="Olympus
List Problem"
|