Subject: | [OM] Re: justification for keeping auto tubes ? |
---|---|
From: | Moose <olymoose@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Mon, 26 Apr 2004 13:49:28 -0700 |
jascione@xxxxxxxx wrote: >Wim: >This looks like something I would like to understand and keep for which >I thank you in advance, but I didn't mentally pick it up at first sight. >36 @ 240 means exactly what? > " This table gives an overview of the smallest possible image width (in mm) at the corresponding lens to subject distance (in mm)" The olympus mailinglist olympus@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: mailto:olympus-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe To contact the list admins: mailto:olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx?subject="Olympus List Problem" |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [OM] Re: Help solving problem, Piers Hemy |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [OM] Re: Website Update and Isle Royale Essay, Graham Battison |
Previous by Thread: | [OM] Re: justification for keeping auto tubes ?, Joseph Ascione |
Next by Thread: | [OM] Re: justification for keeping auto tubes ?, yves barbaroux |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |