My question was more to do with the fact that I had a silvernose with
no letter in front of the 'Zuiko'
Is this unusual?
AndrewF
http://www.pbase.com/afildes
On 26/04/2004, at 4:20 AM, Gordon J. Ross wrote:
>
> Hi Jim:
>
> According to 'dimentia' site you are correct, as a matter of fact one
> could
> state that any focal length with 2.0 aperture lenses are MC, there may
> be
> variances on what MC means, but they are all MC.
>
> http://olympus.dementia.org/Hardware/misc/lensCoatings.txt
>
> Gord
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Jim Brokaw" <jbrokaw@xxxxxxxx>
> To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2004 1:04 AM
> Subject: [OM] Re: Silver nosed Zuiko lenses (24mm)?
>
>
>> on 4/24/04 8:45 PM, Andrew Fildes at afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> I bought myself a 24/2 recently that was a bit of a surprise -
>>> silvernose but marked MC and with no letter in front of the 'Zuiko.'
>>> Seems odd - was there a transition in markings? (I believe that this
>>> was always an MC) - Serial 1006** looks early.
>>> And I asked for a hood first so there!
>>> AndrewF
>>
>> As far as I can recall, all the f2.0 wide angles are MC, even if they
>> are
>> not marked MC and/or are silver-nose. Somebody can correct me here as
>> I'm
>> not 100% certain on this.
>> --
>>
>> Jim Brokaw
>> OM-'s of all sorts, and no OM-oney...
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> The olympus mailinglist olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
>> To unsubscribe: mailto:olympus-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
>>
>> To contact the list admins:
> mailto:olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx?subject="Olympus List Problem"
>>
>
>
> The olympus mailinglist olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
> To unsubscribe: mailto:olympus-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
>
> To contact the list admins:
> mailto:olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx?subject="Olympus List Problem"
>
>
>
The olympus mailinglist olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: mailto:olympus-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
To contact the list admins: mailto:olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx?subject="Olympus
List Problem"
|