Seems like a versatile beast. They had the standard potato masher head with
zoom attachment as the 'basic' unit, and then a few ring light attachment
heads (guess it's actually got interchangeable heads). They were an
additional 40USD.
Like I said, I stumbled onto the T45 and the Sunpacks slipped beyond the
horizon....
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Geilfuss Charles [mailto:Charles.Geilfuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
>Sent: Monday, April 19, 2004 11:12 AM
>To: 'olympus@xxxxxxxxxx'
>Subject: [OM] Re: Sunpack 622 flash
>
>
>Jim,
> I have no first hand experience with this flash,
>however a quick perusal of Photographyreview.com gives it
>mixed reviews...powerful but cheap build quality...complaints
>of multiple failures. Maybe DOD is getting rid of them for a reason.
>
>Charlie
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Timpe, Jim [mailto:Jim.Timpe@xxxxxxxxx]
>Sent: Monday, April 19, 2004 1:54 PM
>To: 'olympus@xxxxxxxxxx'
>Subject: [OM] Re: Sunpack 622 flash
>
>
>
>What does anyone know about them? Kenmore has a bunch of them
>right now they're selling as used, salesman told me they were
>actually returns from DOD (Navy?) having never actually been
>used. I perused a couple, and they do in fact look brand new.
> They're selling them for 199USD a pop.
>
>I was interested until I saw a used (EX+ condition) T45 with
>charger in the cabinet that I talked them down to $250 on.
>
>
>The olympus mailinglist olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
>To unsubscribe: mailto:olympus-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
>
>To contact the list admins:
>mailto:olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx?subject="Olympus
>List Problem"
>
>
>
>The olympus mailinglist olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
>To unsubscribe: mailto:olympus-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
>
>To contact the list admins:
>mailto:olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx?subject="Olympus List >Problem"
>
>
The olympus mailinglist olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: mailto:olympus-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
To contact the list admins: mailto:olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx?subject="Olympus
List Problem"
|