Subject: | [OM] Re: Leica shots |
---|---|
From: | hiwayman@xxxxxxx (Walt Wayman) |
Date: | Mon, 19 Apr 2004 13:16:09 +0000 |
Rob, I don't disagree with your premise at all, but wouldn't that be 24 rolls a year and 120 in five years? Walt (Had a Leica once. Really Leic'd it.) --SNIP-- > > Unless you process your film yourself, the cost of the camera and lens > is a smaller portion of the cost of photography than the > "software"--film and processing. Let's say you shoot two rolls of film > a month. That's 100 a year, 500 over five years. --SNIP-- > > Rob Harrison > Seattle > The olympus mailinglist olympus@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: mailto:olympus-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe To contact the list admins: mailto:olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx?subject="Olympus List Problem" |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [OM] Re: [OT] 3 phase wiring, Terry and Tracey |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [OM] Re: First OM-E-1 photos 135/2.8, Skip Williams |
Previous by Thread: | [OM] Re: Leica shots, ClassicVW |
Next by Thread: | [OM] Re: Leica shots, Rob Harrison |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |