That wasn't the Olympus point. This is based on their months long stance saying
something to the effect of the angulational photonic directionalitude of
sensoral receptivocity will have causational effect on the resultant
obsequestial
duodimensional over tridimensional digitized renderings describablationally
"not good".
After enduring their doubletalk, how many times worse were the in-focus OM
zuiko results compared to the new glass?
Larry
Skip Williams wrote:
> the percentage of keepers would have been much greater with an AF lens. I
> only got about 40 keepers out of 121.
>
> http://skipwilliams.smugmug.com/gallery/101333
>
> Skip
>
> The olympus mailinglist olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
> To unsubscribe: mailto:olympus-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
>
> To contact the list admins: mailto:olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx?subject="Olympus
> List Problem"
>
The olympus mailinglist olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: mailto:olympus-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
To contact the list admins: mailto:olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx?subject="Olympus
List Problem"
|