Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

[OM] Re: Digital or no Digital? was Group membership and contributions

Subject: [OM] Re: Digital or no Digital? was Group membership and contributions
From: "Daniel Tan" <dan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2004 19:34:13 +1000

>Hi Tom, I'm not sure which one is more blasphemous - you saying how
good 
>your Nikon dSLR is, or me pointing out the possibility that may be the 
>results are better because the Nikon glass you are using is better than
the 
>Zuikos you were using...

>There are other explanations of course:
>- digital is better in terms of color rendition
>- digital is grainless
>- your film choice

My vote is for your comment Richard! :-P

Also, you have to take into account the pass through medium - film - and
then the scanner. I have no doubt some filmscanners are the equal - or
better - than some dslrs, but I feel the image "loses" something between
mediums. Digicams feel "cleaner" to me, colour(or lack
thereof)/contrast/grain. Still, nothing feels more rewarding to me than
milling around blindly in a darkroom attempting to enlarge your
favourite negative.

Daniel Tan






The olympus mailinglist olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: mailto:olympus-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe

To contact the list admins: mailto:olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx?subject="Olympus 
List Problem"
        

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz