In <0085727600.00011YTK@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, on 04/11/04
at 11:48 PM, "Ian Manners" <om@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> said:
> Brian could of cause decide that the seller has
>committed fraud and go further but I get the impression that Brian is
>still happy to keep the camera, as the timer fix expense plus the price
>paid for the camera is still a good overall price for a working OM2000.
>As Brian pointed out "He was not interested in any remedies from his end.
>Otherwise, a very pleasant person to deal with. But not honest."
>This to me rates as negative feedback.
Perhaps, then, the "negative feedback" could comprise simply the statement
that "...the camera required a repair to the self-timer that cost $55 to
match the description in the original posting."
It's not ad hominem, then, is it?
-
-----------------------------------------------------------
les clark / edgewater, nj / usa
-----------------------------------------------------------
The olympus mailinglist olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: mailto:olympus-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
To contact the list admins: mailto:olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx?subject="Olympus
List Problem"
|