ML Archiv: [OM] Re: OT A2, was OM-E-System Adapter status in the U.S.

Olympus-OM

[OM] Re: OT A2, was OM-E-System Adapter status in the U.S.

from Winsor Crosby

Subject:	[OM] Re: OT A2, was OM-E-System Adapter status in the U.S.
From:	Winsor Crosby <wincros@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Sat, 10 Apr 2004 12:19:55 -0700

Canon does it too. I don't understand it either.



Winsor
Long Beach, California
USA
On Apr 10, 2004, at 7:26 AM, AG Schnozz wrote:

> Why Minolta has chosen to deflate the sensitivity numbers is
> beyond me.


The olympus mailinglist olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: mailto:olympus-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe

To contact the list admins: mailto:olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx?subject="Olympus 
List Problem"

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[OM] Re: OM-E-System Adapter status in the U.S., ClassicVW [OM] Re: OM-E-System Adapter status in the U.S., Richard F. Man [OM] OT A2, was OM-E-System Adapter status in the U.S., Moose [OM] Re: OT A2, was OM-E-System Adapter status in the U.S., Richard F. Man [OM] Re: OT A2, was OM-E-System Adapter status in the U.S., AG Schnozz [OM] Re: OT A2, was OM-E-System Adapter status in the U.S., Winsor Crosby <= [OM] Re: OT A2, was OM-E-System Adapter status in the U.S., Moose [OM] Re: OT A2, was OM-E-System Adapter status in the U.S., Winsor Crosby [OM] Re: OM-E-System Adapter status in the U.S., Skip Williams [OM] Re: OM-E-System Adapter status in the U.S., ClassicVW

Previous by Date:	[OM] Zuiko 21/3.5, Richard Lovison
Next by Date:	[OM] Re: OT A2, was OM-E-System Adapter status in the U.S., Winsor Crosby
Previous by Thread:	[OM] Re: OT A2, was OM-E-System Adapter status in the U.S., AG Schnozz
Next by Thread:	[OM] Re: OT A2, was OM-E-System Adapter status in the U.S., Moose
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]