50/1.4s were made in several different variations over almost the whole
time OM bodies were made. Only at the very end were they discontinued in
favor of the 50/1.2. The very, very earliest used rare earth, slightly
radioactive elements in the glass. There were at least 2 different
coating variations in the SC versions and at least another 2 in the MC
versions and there were some mechanical and lens element changes along
the way too. Like other Zuikos, the silver nose is not the absolute
indicator of SC. 50/1.4s marked G.ZUIKO are SC and all others are MC.
Early multi-coated lenses have an 'MC' designation on the front ring.
Later MC lenses, after it was clear that all lenses were multi-coated
anyway, dropped the 'MC' marking. The last 50/1.4s, after the MC marking
was dropped, and especially above ~serial #1,085,000, are really
excellent lenses, especially remarkable for their even performance over
the whole aperture range. There are many lengthier treatises, some by
me, on this subject in the archives.
A later 1.8 will generally be optically better than an early 1.4 and
vice versa. Beyond that, unless you are using very careful techinque and
making big enlargements, it's a toss-up, you would have to test the
individual lenses in question. The 'MC' marked version of the 1.8 has a
common problem with grease/oil migrating from the helicoid to the
aperture blades and causing slow return from stopping down. 1.4s and
later 1.8s very seldom suffer from this problem.
Moose
farali@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>Were the 50mm F1.4 Zuiko's only made in the Silver Nose version? Just
>wondered. I have only come across silver nosed versions. Does this mean they
>are all single coated? What is the general opinion on this lens vs the 1.8?
>
>
The olympus mailinglist olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: mailto:olympus-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
To contact the list admins: mailto:olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx?subject="Olympus
List Problem"
|