Moose
When you use this format, you have the choice of qualities or
'lossless'. I should have expected that to fulfill its description.
Are you telling me that this dialogue box is an out and out liar? ;-)
Chris
On 1 Apr 2004 , at 8:15, Moose wrote:
>
> JPEG2000 is not lossless, just better than regular JPEG.
>
> Moose
>
> hiwayman@xxxxxxx wrote:
>
>> Chris,
>>
>> Apologies for the belated response. My e-mail pitched a fit late
>> yesterday and all I was getting was "That page is not available"
>> until this morning.
>>
>> I'll give the JPEG2000 a try. Or get a DVD burner. :-)
>>
>>
>
>
> The olympus mailinglist olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
> To unsubscribe: mailto:olympus-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
>
> To contact the list admins:
> mailto:olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx?subject="Olympus List Problem"
>
>
>
<|_:-)_|>
C M I Barker
Cambridgeshire, Great Britain.
+44 (0)7092 251126
ftog at threeshoes.co.uk
http://www.threeshoes.co.uk
http://homepage.mac.com/zuiko
... a nascent photo library.
The olympus mailinglist olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: mailto:olympus-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
To contact the list admins: mailto:olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx?subject="Olympus
List Problem"
|