Subject: | [OM] Re: Why E1 over others? |
---|---|
From: | W Shumaker <om4t@xxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Thu, 01 Apr 2004 09:29:30 -0500 |
I'll save many words and point to: http://www.dantestella.com/technical/digital.html > Richard wrote: >I found some of these decidedly "anti-new Olympus" attitude interesting. >First of all, who says camera equipments is 100% logical? <snip> make that "anti-new digital" for me. I DO want a nice digital camera. But so far only the P&S models improve on portability, but those lack in the performance I desire. Wayne The olympus mailinglist olympus@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: mailto:olympus-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe To contact the list admins: mailto:olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx?subject="Olympus List Problem" |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [OM] Re: Another digital PRoduct Information reLease FrOm OLy, David Cochran |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [OM] Re: OM full function adapter for the E1!, Skip Williams |
Previous by Thread: | [OM] Re: Why E1 over others?, Andrew Gullen |
Next by Thread: | [OM] Re: Why E1 over others?, Stephen Scharf |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |