It doesn't stop me wanting a 4T.
James
On 31 Mar 2004, at 12:27, Piers Hemy wrote:
>
> No, it's not wrong Henrik. I am wrong.
>
> But don't tell Dan, I think we have him nearly hooked on a 4T!
>
> Sorry all.
>
> Piers
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx] On
> Behalf
> Of Henrik Dahl
> Sent: 31 March 2004 11:59
> To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [OM] Re: external ambient/flash/reflected Lightmeters
>
>
> I always thought the T-32 on a OM-2n used TTL OTF just like on the 4T.
> Is that wrong?
> Henrik
>
>
> 31 mar 2004 kl. 12.39 Piers Hemy wrote:
>> Keep in mind that the flash auto exposure on a 2n is based on what
>> the flashgun sees through its own sensor, regardless of where the
>> camera lens is pointing, regardless of whether it is a 16mm or a 500mm
>> lens.
> (snip)
>> The 4T is different - the flash expsoure is based on what the camera
>> sees through the lens you are using, and depending also on what is in
>> the frame from shot to shot.
>>
>
>
> The olympus mailinglist olympus@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe:
> mailto:olympus-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
>
> To contact the list admins:
> mailto:olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx?subject="Olympus
> List Problem"
>
>
> The olympus mailinglist olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
> To unsubscribe: mailto:olympus-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
>
> To contact the list admins:
> mailto:olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx?subject="Olympus List Problem"
>
>
The olympus mailinglist olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: mailto:olympus-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
To contact the list admins: mailto:olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx?subject="Olympus
List Problem"
|