Was that the 250/2 or the 350/2.8? (Both are roughly the same size though.)
>
>Subject: [OM] I'm back and an interesting statistic
> From: NSURIT@xxxxxxx
> Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2004 08:11:14 EST
> To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>Well, I just got back from a week with Rocky Mountain School of Photography
>in Savannah, Georgia and Sapelo Island. I great week of burning and learning
>with two instructors and 15 other photographers. The split was probably
>somewhere arounf 1/3 digital and 2/3 film. The most interesting statistic
>forme
>was that out of 16 photographers, three were using Olympus OM equipment. One
>of
>the guys, who expressed an interest in this group had three lenses that do not
>reside in my gear locker. They were the 24mm shift, the 35-80mm and the 350mm
>f2. I had a wondeful time and would encourage any who are interested to
>check out their offerings at rmsp.com. And, yes, I got some great images.
>Bill
>Barber
>
>
>The olympus mailinglist olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
>To unsubscribe: mailto:olympus-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
>
>To contact the list admins: mailto:olympusadmins@xxxxxxxxxx?subject="Olympus
>List Problem"
The olympus mailinglist olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: mailto:olympus-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
To contact the list admins: mailto:olympusadmins@xxxxxxxxxx?subject="Olympus
List Problem"
|