Subject: | [OM] Re: F280 bounce flash/flash options |
---|---|
From: | Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Mon, 15 Mar 2004 17:44:12 -0500 |
Sunpak 433D is a nice choice. Very versatile. Chuck Norcutt ClassicVW@xxxxxxx wrote: > Come to think of it, Maybe a better first flash option would be one of > the Sunpaks with dedicated OM module for around $30 on the used market. > That said, I still felt the need for a F280. The olympus mailinglist olympus@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: mailto:olympus-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe To contact the list admins: mailto:olympusadmins@xxxxxxxxxx?subject="Olympus List Problem" |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [OM] Re: Dust..., Donald MacDonald |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [OM] Re: Dust..., Thomas Heide Clausen |
Previous by Thread: | [OM] Re: F280 bounce flash/flash options, ClassicVW |
Next by Thread: | [OM] Re: F280 bounce flash/flash options, Skip Williams |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |