On Thu, 11 Mar 2004 21:25:05 -0000
"Piers Hemy" <piers@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> 1 60 meters
Sounds OK. I like the price the housing at:
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=3800854196&category=4703
went for. I have to keep my eyes open....
>
> 2 Need lots of 'em? Precisely my point!
Heh -- who doesn't need lots of OM's anyways? ;)
--thomas
>
> Piers
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx] On
> Behalf Of Thomas Heide Clausen
> Sent: 11 March 2004 21:13
> To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [OM] Re: UW OMography?
>
>
> On Thu, 11 Mar 2004 20:57:18 -0000
> "Piers Hemy" <piers@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> >
> > Look out for "Ikelite" housings Thomas. They occasionally turn up on
> > that auction site, they aren't cheap, but they *are* designed for
> > underwater work with OM cameras (there are also models for Nik, Can
> > etc, but you won't want them, will you?).
>
> Piers, do you know the depth-rating of those? I know of current Ikelite
> housings (for Ni*** and Ca***), which seem to be suitable for 30-50m or
> so.....
>
> >
> > Piers
> >
> > PS Another candidate for the top ten alternative uses: As ballast when
> > diving.
>
> Heh, with about 500gr for an OM body, and with a relatively large volume,
> you'll (unless you're a lean mean terminator build) need a whole lot of
> OM1s to achieve neutral bouyancy, regardless of exposure-suit.....;)
>
> --thomas
>
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx] On
> > Behalf Of Thomas Heide Clausen
> > Sent: 11 March 2004 20:36
> > To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: [OM] UW OMography?
> >
> >
> > Gentlefolks,
> >
> > I was wondering....do anyone have any experiences regarding
> > UW-photography using our beloved OM's? I've been considering for a
> > while that it might make for a viable solution (nice fast glass),
> > however I've not seen any UW-housing for OMs....I assume that such
> > exists, though, but I've not managed to find it anywhere.
> >
> > The two viable alternatives seems, to me, to be a digicam + an UW
> > house or a Sea&Sea MMIII -- but I'd much love to be able to use an OM.
> > Any listees with experience with this?
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > --thomas
> >
> > The olympus mailinglist olympus@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe:
> > mailto:olympus-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
> >
> > To contact the list admins:
> > mailto:olympusadmins@xxxxxxxxxx?subject="Olympus List Problem"
> >
> >
> > The olympus mailinglist olympus@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe:
> > mailto:olympus-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
> >
> > To contact the list admins:
> > mailto:olympusadmins@xxxxxxxxxx?subject="Olympus List Problem"
> >
>
>
> --
>
> ------------------------------------------------
> Thomas Heide Clausen
> Civilingeniør i Datateknik (cand.polyt)
> M.Sc in Computer Engineering
>
> E-Mail: T.Clausen@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> WWW: http://voop.free.fr/
> ------------------------------------------------
>
> The olympus mailinglist olympus@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe:
> mailto:olympus-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
>
> To contact the list admins:
> mailto:olympusadmins@xxxxxxxxxx?subject="Olympus List Problem"
>
> The olympus mailinglist olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
> To unsubscribe: mailto:olympus-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
>
> To contact the list admins:
> mailto:olympusadmins@xxxxxxxxxx?subject="Olympus List Problem"
>
--
------------------------------------------------
Thomas Heide Clausen
Civilingeniør i Datateknik (cand.polyt)
M.Sc in Computer Engineering
E-Mail: T.Clausen@xxxxxxxxxxxx
WWW: http://voop.free.fr/
------------------------------------------------
The olympus mailinglist olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: mailto:olympus-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
To contact the list admins: mailto:olympusadmins@xxxxxxxxxx?subject="Olympus
List Problem"
|