Subject: | [OM] Re: Tamron 80-200 f 2.8 |
---|---|
From: | Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Wed, 03 Mar 2004 07:24:54 -0500 |
To each his own. I frequently use up to 150mm. But then I am so close that there isn't much background to be separated and what's back there is nothing but nice bokeh. Chuck Norcutt Mike wrote: <snip> for a formal portrait i think 85 is > about max. Any more than that and the foreshortening in the depth of > the human body starts to become apparent. The olympus mailinglist olympus@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: mailto:olympus-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe To contact the list admins: mailto:olympusadmins@xxxxxxxxxx?subject="Olympus List Problem" |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [OM] Re: OT - FedEx vs UPS, Andrew Gullen |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [OM] Re: Far sighted on the OM1, Chuck Norcutt |
Previous by Thread: | [OM] Re: Tamron 80-200 f 2.8, Mike |
Next by Thread: | [OM] Re: Tamron 80-200 f 2.8, Skip Williams |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |