Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

[OM] Re: OM-2 vs. OM-2n (WAS: olympus Digest V1 #46)

Subject: [OM] Re: OM-2 vs. OM-2n (WAS: olympus Digest V1 #46)
From: Fernando Gonzalez Gentile <fgnzalez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2004 01:19:17 -0300
on 29/02/2004 23:20, Listar at listar@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:

> Would you agree, that if the plastic shoe was
> solid metal that the damage could be more extensive?
> 
> Gord
Yes, it could be. But cracked shoes don't seem a result of impact but of
continuous screw pressure on a lesser material whose choice was made on the
basis of the development of the T series - shoes should be inexpensive.

Besides, I do agree with your reasons for unfixing the shoe. I do it for the
same reasons. Would the shoes been made of metal, I bet most users would
unscrew them as well (maybe not so often)

For damaging the prism itself, I suppose a really hard bump should be
necessary (how much distance is there between the housing and the prism? I
don't know) and such an impact may damage other components too or the entire
top cover.

We're about to build the perfect OM2(n) ;-)))

Saludos,

Fernando.


The olympus mailinglist olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: mailto:olympus-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe

To contact the list admins: mailto:olympusadmins@xxxxxxxxxx?subject="Olympus 
List Problem"

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz