>On Feb 19, 2004, at 1:34 AM, Jim Brokaw wrote:
>>
>> The camera is interesting but I don't see any advantage to having them
>> make
>> it in OM mount. The rangefinder would not couple to Zuiko lenses, so it
>> would be strictly scale focusing. Even if it offered manual control of
>> aperture and shutter speed, it would be more awkward to use than an
>> adapter
>> on a Canon digital SLR. The digital Epson/Cosina rangefinder is pretty
>> much
>> only going to be useful with Leica and Cosina-Voigtlander and similar
>> mount
>> lenses, some of which are not too bad anyway... <g>
>
>No, I didn't mean as an RF. Cosina has gotten a huge amount of mileage
>out of that body. Bessa L, T, R, R2, OM-2000, FM-10, FE-10 (I think
>those are the 2 Nikon bodies, could be wrong), etc, etc. One of the
>more recent variations was an M42 mount SLR. My thinking was that if
>they can put a digital back on this body and make it work as an RF then
>they can probably do the same thing with any of the SLR versions of the
>body too.
>
The possibilities are endless but other versions of the Bessamatic
beyond the M42 version have not appeared. Also, the R2 is
substantally altered to say the least - rangefinder, short film-lens
distance, no mirror, double shutter. To describe it as the same body
is a stretch. Rather it is a different body which shares some basic
components. But, those components are significant - the back
structure, which is relevant in this discussion, is shared. We can
but hope for an OM2000 didge but I'm not holding my breath or
anything else.
AndrewF
The olympus mailinglist olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: mailto:olympus-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
To contact the list admins: mailto:olympusadmins@xxxxxxxxxx?subject="Olympus
List Problem"
|