Subject: | [OM] Re: Zuiko 35~105/3.5-4.5 |
---|---|
From: | Tris Schuler <tristanjohn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Tue, 17 Feb 2004 20:54:53 -0800 |
>Moose babbling on Actually you're doing pretty good. I'm the one babbling around here. I thought I was responding to a query re the 35-70, not the 35-105. I've never owned, used, touched or even seen at a distance the latter. Tris (King of Babble Mountain) The olympus mailinglist olympus@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: mailto:olympus-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe To contact the list admins: mailto:olympusadmins@xxxxxxxxxx?subject="Olympus List Problem" |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [OM] on eBay Series 1 90-180/f4.5 Was: examples of latest work, Jim Couch |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [OM] Re: [OM]Now my question 500mmreflex or 300mm tele, NSURIT |
Previous by Thread: | [OM] Re: Zuiko 35~105/3.5-4.5, Moose |
Next by Thread: | [OM] Re: Zuiko 35~105/3.5-4.5, Wayne Harridge |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |