What makes me nervous about the 10D is that there are lots of complaints
in the dpreview forums about the autofocus often being inaccurate. And
it's difficult to check on the autofocus accuracy visually since the
finder isn't really built for manual focus. Some believe that at least
part of the problem is the sensors angle of view is supposedly larger
than the area indicated in the viewfinder.
The same forums praise the E-1 for its fast and accurate autofocus.
Something doesn't jive here.
I've used a 10D ocassionally but it has always been mounted on a tripod
in a studio. Not much of a test. I've handled a couple of E-1's very
briefly in stores but the last time I went to take a serious look the
battery was run down and it wouldn't do much of anything.
The MA-1 is purportedly the OM to 4/3 adapter. I say "purportedly"
since doing a search on "MA-1" on Oly America's website will return a
PCMCIA adapter for 2, 4 & 8 MB SmartMedia cards.
Chuck Norcutt
Stephen Scharf wrote:
> Well, it's a pretty sweet camera...that new 150mm f2.0 makes it look
> even more tempting, too. If I had to choose, though, I would still go
> with the 10D. Why? 6 vs 5 megapixels, CMOS vs CCD sensor, faster
> autofocus, 7 autofocus zones instead of three. The E-1 still has
> notable autofocus problems even in store-level light, the two times I
> used one for some sample photos. I am still hoping my friend will get
> one on long-term loan so we can play with it for some length of time.
> The build quality of the E-1 is nicer, and the metering seems to work
> really really well, as the histograms you get are full and rich with
> data. But, IMHO, there's no beating that CMOS sensor for image
> quality. Plus, the successor to the 10D will be out sometime this
> year, anyway, I would bet. BTW, Chuck, what is an MA-1?
>
> -Stephen.
The olympus mailinglist olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: mailto:olympus-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
To contact the list admins: mailto:olympusadmins@xxxxxxxxxx?subject="Olympus
List Problem"
|