Subject: | [OM] 90/2 vs. 135/4.5 opinions |
---|---|
From: | gries@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
Date: | Mon, 9 Feb 2004 13:15:16 -0600 |
I know they are fairly different lenses, but for images, how would one compare the two? The heavy contrast of the 135/4.5 reminds me of my N*kon days, but the extra length is good for most things - both macro dist. and grab on long shots. lets keep the OM bandwidth up. The olympus mailinglist olympus@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: mailto:olympus-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe To contact the list admins: mailto:olympusadmins@xxxxxxxxxx?subject="Olympus List Problem" |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [OM] Re: Digital Bridge Camera, ClassicVW |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [OM] Re: Preston Capes Northamptonshire, gries |
Previous by Thread: | [OM] Preston Capes Northamptonshire, GeeBeePhoto |
Next by Thread: | [OM] Re: Preston Capes Northamptonshire, gries |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |