More validation that 5-6 MgPx is good enough for 95%+ of photographs taken
today.
The rest can use MF/LF scanned with a flat-bed to get the best quality. (I'm
not including traditional, film-to-paper solutions as I'm not in that market
anymore.)
I don't print 30x40's very much....Heck, I don't print 16x20's much, and
digital is great at those sizes.
Skip
>
>Subject: [OM] Re: Quality of digital vs film
> From: Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2004 09:25:08 -0500
> To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
>
>Also see this page:
><http://www.sphoto.com/techinfo/dslrvsfilm.htm>
>
>Chuck Norcutt
>Woburn, Massachusetts, USA
>
>
>
>
>
>The olympus mailinglist olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
>To unsubscribe: mailto:olympus-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
>
>To contact the list admins: mailto:olympusadmins@xxxxxxxxxx?subject="Olympus
>List Problem"
The olympus mailinglist olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: mailto:olympus-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
To contact the list admins: mailto:olympusadmins@xxxxxxxxxx?subject="Olympus
List Problem"
|