ML Archiv: [OM] Re: Quality of digital vs film

Subject:	[OM] Re: Quality of digital vs film
From:	Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Mon, 09 Feb 2004 09:25:08 -0500

Also see this page:
<http://www.sphoto.com/techinfo/dslrvsfilm.htm>

Chuck Norcutt
Woburn, Massachusetts, USA





The olympus mailinglist olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: mailto:olympus-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe

To contact the list admins: mailto:olympusadmins@xxxxxxxxxx?subject="Olympus 
List Problem"

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[OM] Nice 300/2.8 E-1 Picture, Skip Williams [OM] Re: Nice 300/2.8 E-1 Picture, Bolty [OM] Re: Nice 300/2.8 E-1 Picture, David Cochran [OM] Re: Nice 300/2.8 E-1 Picture, Jim Brokaw [OM] Re: Nice 300/2.8 E-1 Picture, David Cochran [OM] Re: Quality of digital vs film, was: Nice 300/2.8 E-1 Picture, Chuck Norcutt [OM] Re: Quality of digital vs film, was: Nice 300/2.8 E-1 Picture, Winsor Crosby [OM] Re: Quality of digital vs film, Chuck Norcutt <= [OM] Re: Quality of digital vs film, C.H.Ling [OM] Re: Quality of digital vs film, Chuck Norcutt [OM] Re: Quality of digital vs film, C.H.Ling [OM] Re: OM shenanigans wow! Why pay $1742. when you can pay :370$, Gordon J. Ross [OM] Re: OM shenanigans wow! Why pay $1742. when you can pay :370$, James N. McBride [OM] Re: OM shenanigans wow! Why pay $1742. when you can pay :370$, Gordon J. Ross [OM] Re: OM shenanigans wow! Why pay $1742. when you can pay :370$, James N. McBride [OM] Re: OM shenanigans wow! Why pay $1742. when you can pay :370$, Piers Hemy [OM] Re: Odds and ends and Technical Pan, who'd care to be an also-ran?, Tris Schuler

Previous by Date:	[OM] Re: Photoshop, Chuck Norcutt
Next by Date:	[OM] Digital Bridge Camera, Robert Lewis
Previous by Thread:	[OM] Re: Quality of digital vs film, was: Nice 300/2.8 E-1 Picture, Winsor Crosby
Next by Thread:	[OM] Re: Quality of digital vs film, C.H.Ling
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]