Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

[OM] The future of CCD sensors

Subject: [OM] The future of CCD sensors
From: Joe Gwinn <joegwinn@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2004 16:59:25 -0500
An intersting article appears on page 1 of the 2 February 2004 issue of 
Electrical Engineering Times (www.eet.com), a trade rag, titled "Roving eye for 
Mars forces CCD rethink", by Richard Goering.  The basic story is that no 
commercially available CCD image was suitable for the nine cameras on the Mars 
rovers, so NASA had JPL develop a full-custom CCD image.  The specs on this 
CHIp give an idea what can be achieved; such things inevitably find their way 
into consumer products after a few years.

The full story is at 
<http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/mission/spacecraft_rover_eyes.html>.

The cameras are better described in 
<http://europa.la.asu.edu:8585/PGG/greeley/courses/pdf/squyres_2003.pdf>.

Image is 1034x1024 pixels (monochrome), with each pixel being 12 microns square.

The full-well linear capacity is 200,000 electrons, and the noise is 3 
electrons in a half-full well (100,000 electrons).  20log10(200000/3)= 96.5 db, 
or 16 bits, with 99% linearity.  (This compares to the 12 bits we have been 
seeing in high-end digital cameras.)  The temperature range is -90 to +20 
degrees centigrade, and no mention is made of a chip cooler.  (Mars is cold to 
start with, so why bother.)

The article reports that developing the charge-to-voltage circuit (converts the 
charge in a pixel well into an output voltage) was the big challenge.  The 
output is 4.8 microvolts per electron, so the noise level is 3(4.8)= 14.4 
microvolts, which is pretty good.

Joe Gwinn

The olympus mailinglist olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: mailto:olympus-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe

To contact the list admins: mailto:olympusadmins@xxxxxxxxxx?subject="Olympus 
List Problem"

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz