[OM] Re: [OT] Canon EOS-1D Mark II review on DPR

[Tris Schuler]

As talk turns more and more to the digital side of photography's "other 
self" I'd guess there will be fewer screams of protest on this list with 
offerings of this nature. Be that as it may, I found the following review 
of no little interest. Can't afford to invest as much as Canon wants for 
this puppy (not to mention its lens line--check out this little number for 
example:

        http://www.dpreview.com/news/0401/04012901canon28300is.asp

I've not thoroughly researched the digital side of things but I must admit 
that on the face of it it would appear that the quality and performance gap 
between analog and digital is rapidly closing in almost all respects left 
up for contention and in virtually all other areas the newcomer has long 
since outstripped the old technology's real-world potential.

I also think from the little I've read that if Olympus plans on becoming a 
serious player it had better hire a "brain" fast and invest carte blanche 
in its intellect and vision . . . for at the moment Canon is a dream ahead.

http://www.dpreview.com/articles/canoneos1dmkii/

Tris


The olympus mailinglist olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: mailto:olympus-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe

To contact the list admins: mailto:olympusadmins@xxxxxxxxxx?subject="Olympus 
List Problem"