wut'a wrong with the 200/4? I get excellent results with mine....
As for small and light in the 200mm area, nothing beats the 200/5. Excellent
lens, quite sharpp. Incidentially I have two (N and BN) -- who said
zuikoholic...? :)
--thomas
(on the road, reading emails over the phone on his pda....sighS)
________________ Reply Header ________________
Subject: [OM] regrets: Zuiko 200/4
Author: gries@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2004 18:36:51 +0100
Although the 200/4 wasn't that great of a lens it was pretty small and light.
I do miss it. I thought that I could fill my 200mm needs with a Tam 80-200/2.8.
ah, the memories...
http://www.nothingrhymeswithorange.com/gries/Journal/am-020.jpg
The olympus mailinglist olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: mailto:olympus-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
To contact the list admins: mailto:olympusadmins@xxxxxxxxxx?subject="Olympus
List Problem"
The olympus mailinglist olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: mailto:olympus-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
To contact the list admins: mailto:olympusadmins@xxxxxxxxxx?subject="Olympus
List Problem"
|
