Subject: | Re: [OM] ( OM ) film usage. |
---|---|
From: | Moose <olymoose@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Thu, 01 Jan 2004 21:58:06 -0800 |
That's Greek to me! andrew fildes wrote: Pre-socratic aquatic to be precise. AndrewFSeems to echo another, more earthy metaphor, as well. ;-) MooseFilm is cheap, the equipment isn't but the most expensive thing of all is your time and the opportunity. Burn film - you can never dip your lens in the same image twice. < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [OM] OT Haggis v. Pie, was "Real World Tests", Moose |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] A look ahead?, Walt Wayman |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] ( OM ) film usage., andrew fildes |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] ( OM ) film usage., David Cochran |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |