Subject: | Re: Re: [OM] Vivitar 35-105/f3.5 vs. Zuiko 135/f2.8, Macro 50/f3.5, 28/f3.5 |
---|---|
From: | Wayne Harridge <wayneharridge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Fri, 02 Jan 2004 14:42:57 +1100 |
> ClassicVW@xxxxxxx <ClassicVW@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > Yes. Wasn't there an old Olympus brochure that showed how small the > Zuikos > were by showing a photog. changing lenses by holding two lenses in > one hand, the > one he took off and the one he was putting on the body? > Easily done with the wides, normals and short teles, I wouldn't try it with a 300/4.5. Wayne Harridge http://members.optusnet.com.au/~w_harridge < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] OT: Canon 10D survived fall into the STREET !, Wayne Harridge |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Re: [OM] OT: Canon 10D survived fall into the STREET !, Wayne Harridge |
Previous by Thread: | [OM] OT: Canon 10D survived fall into the STREET !, Lama-Jim L'Hommedieu |
Next by Thread: | [OM] studio light recommendations, james olson |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |