Charles,
I was very serious. Your view that "That leaves us a pretty broad spectrum of
wondeful
olympus things to discuss and still be on topic." makes my case for me. I need
not
argue about it. That being said, I guess most anything can be on topic if you
want it
to be.
There are some older list members out there that know exactly what I am talking
about. If you can't recollect, then you haven't been on the list long enough.
GeoW
On 30 Dec 2003 at 22:07, Charles Sdunek wrote:
> George,
>
> I can't decide whether or not you are yanking our chains or not. But
> I see nowhere that this list is for OM only, but that it is "supposed
> to be used for discussing Olympus related topics." As stated at the
> list home page http://zuiko.sls.bc.ca/~swright/olympuslist.shtml
>
> That leaves us a pretty broad spectrum of wondeful olympus things to
> discuss and still be on topic.
>
> Just in case you were serious...
>
> Charles
>
> GeoW wrote:
>
> > Please remember this list is expressly for "any Olympus OM-series
> > camera" that you are comparing these digital wonders to. I also
> > repeat, this is not an all things Olympus list but OM. :-) Who was
> > it that slipped far out on that limb to proclaim that even
> > Pearlcorders were included? Not.
> >
> > GeoW
> >
> >
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|