Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] OM-2N vs. 4T

Subject: Re: [OM] OM-2N vs. 4T
From: "John Hermanson" <omtech@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2003 08:40:56 -0500
4T and Ti are fine in the reliability department.  Parts are just too
expensive.
----------------------------------------------------
John Hermanson  www.zuiko.com
mail:  omtech@xxxxxxxxx
Camtech, Olympus Sales & Service since 1977
21 South Lane, Huntington NY 11743-4714
631-424-2121  Turnaround 4-5 weeks
----------------------------------------------------
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Ross Orr" <voxbongo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, December 15, 2003 7:33 PM
Subject: [OM] OM-2N vs. 4T


> "John Hermanson" <omtech@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >Because it feels like a familiar friend, is ultra-reliable and very
> >serviceable (circuits, meters, curtains, tops, all available).
> >[...]
> >- ----- Original Message -----
> >From: "Titoy" <litefoot@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 9:26 AM
> >Subject: Re: [OM] Digital and the Olympus E System
> >
> >  > why not a 4T?
> >  >
>
> Well I was sold already. . . but is this a hint that a 4T might not
> be so reliable?
>
> And John, are there any particular trouble spots with the 2N to look
> out for? Tell-tale warning signs of costly repairs ahead?
>
> Thanks,
>
>    --Ross
>
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~
> 42.2855 North
> 83.7497 West
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
>
>



< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz