I believe that legally Walt is blessed by both freedom of assembly and
freedom of movement. Now, which applies?
Julian
----- Original Message -----
From: "GeoW" <gwsears@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 3:05 AM
Subject: [OM] Walt's restrictions
>
>
> On 11 Dec 2003 at 21:48, ll.clark@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>
> > In <200312111625.AA3479437344@xxxxxxxxx>, on 12/11/03
> > at 04:25 PM, "Walt Wayman" <hiwayman@xxxxxxxxx> said:
> >
> > >Of course, is there some law that requires retired folk to wear
> > >undergarments if they're not going beyond the end of the driveway?
> >
> > NO!
> >
> > -
> > -----------------------------------------------------------
> > les clark / edgewater, nj / usa
> > -----------------------------------------------------------
> >
>
> Why restrict yourself to the end of your driveway when there's a whole
world out
> there, no laws apply.
>
> I really must think about this some more.
>
> GeoW
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
>
>
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|