>
>
>Another issue is archival print quality. With wet darkroom methods and=
> materials, one can produce prints of archival fairly easily and=
> inexpensively. My understanding is that the equipment and inks for=
> archival digital prints is not a throwaway purchase... maybe I am wrong.=
> I strongly doubt that walking into Costco and coming out with an archival=
> print for $2.99 is possible. Again, someone correct me if I am wrong.=
> And no, I don't want to start up the digital vs. film storage/archiving=
> debate!
>
>Earl
>
Archival quality digital prints are easily produced at home for about a
dollar +/-. Capital investment is much less than your wet darkroom.
mike
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|