Subject: | [OM] Re: olympus-digest V2 #4448 |
---|---|
From: | Stephen Scharf <scharfsj@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Sun, 30 Nov 2003 21:15:43 -0800 |
Actually, I would go with Canon if for the only reason of having access to the 70-200/2.8 L.Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2003 23:11:04 +0800 From: "C.H.Ling" <chling@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: Re: [OM] digital poll I had decided on the 10D and it was before the available of E-1, if you let me choose again I will still bought the 10D. It can be used with all my Zuikos, the price is much cheaper too. 10D has larger viewfinder, faster focusing (with the AF lenses), higher pixel count, lower noise, good image quality and excellent post processing control with PhaseOne RAW converter, why I should buy a E-1? Ok! the 50-200 f/2.8-3.5 is great, this will be the only reason I invest on E-2. C.H.Ling -Stephen. -- 2001 CBR600F4i - Fantastic! < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [OM] Re: olympus-digest V2 #4448, Stephen Scharf |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] Re: OT now Coke, mutating to chemistry and etc..., Gregg Iverson |
Previous by Thread: | [OM] Re: olympus-digest V2 #4448, Stephen Scharf |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] Re: olympus-digest V2 #4448, Danrich |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |