No, but close
----- Original Message -----
From: "Titoy" <litefoot@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sunday, November 30, 2003 7:42 AM
Subject: Re: [OM] E-1 4/3 vs. full sensor
>
> Not completely?
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Tom Scales" <tscales@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Sunday, November 30, 2003 6:38 PM
> Subject: Re: [OM] E-1 4/3 vs. full sensor
>
>
> > That's why I made my decision to, gasp, leave Zuikos behind.
> >
> > Tom
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Skip Williams" <om2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Sent: Saturday, November 29, 2003 9:38 PM
> > Subject: Re: [OM] E-1 4/3 vs. full sensor
> >
> >
> > > I agree with you on this one Bill. The "advantage" of using OM-System
> > Zuiko lenses on a body in stop-down mode will quickly become tiresome.
I
> > bet that in a short number of months, I'd become thoroughly tired of
such
> a
> > setup and move completely to AF lenses.
> > >
> > > Perhaps the use of a couple of the macros or the shift lens would be
> nice,
> > but most of the other lenses would be useful only for subjects that
didn't
> > move.
> > >
> > > Skip
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
> >
>
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
>
>
>
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|