ML Archiv: Re: [OM] 100 2.8 Seiko

Subject:	Re: [OM] 100 2.8 Seiko
From:	"Dick Lague" <rlague@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Sat, 29 Nov 2003 11:04:16 -0800

I have a couple of these.  They are great lenses.  I will see if mine
are MC.
Dick

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of John Sutton
Sent: Saturday, November 29, 2003 11:51 AM
To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [OM] 100 2.8 Zuiko

I've just picked up one of the above to try out. It's annotated E.Zuiko
(5 elements?) and no MC mark, so I guess it's single coated.

I can't afford the 100 2.0, but should I hold out in the hope of finding
a later MC version?

Appreciate any advice.

Cheers

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[OM] 100 2.8 Zuiko, John Sutton Re: [OM] 100 2.8 Zuiko, Mickey Trageser Re: [OM] 100 2.8 Zuiko, Moose Re: [OM] 100 2.8 Zuiko, Lama-Jim L'Hommedieu Re: [OM] 100 2.8 Seiko, Dick Lague <= Re: [OM] 100 2.8 Zuiko, Tom Scales Re: [OM] 100 2.8 Zuiko, AG Schnozz Re: [OM] 100 2.8 Zuiko, Jim Brokaw

Previous by Date:	Re: [OM] sick om4, Mickey Trageser
Next by Date:	[OM] ( OM ) OT OT Mike Moore OT OT, Brian Swale
Previous by Thread:	Re: [OM] 100 2.8 Zuiko, Lama-Jim L'Hommedieu
Next by Thread:	Re: [OM] 100 2.8 Zuiko, Tom Scales
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]