Well said Graham, in regard to the attraction of the Oms. You speak for more
than yourself.
Bravely said, in regard to your part in the future - you will not be alone!
And well seen, in regard to your portrayal of an area I know quite well, but
haven't had the chance to explore properly. A
colleague once described the Haselbech-Cottesbrooke road as heaven on earth -
over to you to comment/document!
And in regard to what (in another message) you took to be welcoming threats of
violence, if that is the way you interpreted one of
my messages, you must have been mistaken. (Backtrack mode on, I am not as
distant as I need to be, in case he gets the first blow
in!)
Piers
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of GeeBee
> Sent: 17 November 2003 09:35
> To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [OM] New subscriber now OT Leica Panasonic
>
>
--snip
> The future, some would argue the present also, is obviously
> digital but I just wont be part of it. Anything in particular
> I like more about the OM system? It's not a quality thing,
> it's not a versatility thing. It's not even a rational thing.
> The reason, which probably wouldn't make sense anywhere else
> but on this list, is that OM's are objects of great beauty. I
> love them. Ever since I saw the first OM1's in a store window
> and thought "I've got to get one of those little gems".
>
> --Graham
>
>
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
>
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|