Yes, with a digital camera at low ISO, the noise is much less than scanned
files (especially negative), hence the file size will be smaller under the
same level of compression.
C.H.Ling
----- Original Message -----
From: "IanG" <I@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> That is certainly is an answer, I tend to compress less if I know the
> recipient is on a fast connection, but one of the groups I belong to
insist
> on a maximum fie size of 100K. I shall experiment with several scans of
the
> same image.... Or get an E-1 with its tiny 15mb images.
>
> Ian
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On
> Behalf Of C.H.Ling
> Sent: Sunday, November 16, 2003 12:38 AM
> To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [OM] Scanning / compressing a file for Tope 16
>
> 100K for an image of 700 pixel in width is not enough, especially for
> complex scenes, you will need 150-200K for a better look. I usually use
> compression level "9" in PS.
>
> C.H.Ling
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|