I've heard varying numbers on the potential sensor resolution based on Kodak
pubs. Anywhere from 12 to 32MP. Dunno what's real, and dunno what are the
potential "side effects" of increased resolution.
*********** REPLY SEPARATOR ***********
On 11/12/2003 at 9:06 AM Bill Pearce wrote:
>I found Reichmann's E1 review interesting. He is often accused of being a
>shameless shill for Canon products, a not unfair judgement. His recent
>review of the new Pentax was unfavorable. He was, on the other hand, all in
>all complementary toward the E1.
>
>The important comments are in reference to the sensor size. He makes a
>strong case that the system will be limited in performance and growth due
>to
>the small sensor.
>
>Things get more interesting. Maybe by 2010 or so, when the local camera
>store gets one, I'll be able to make my own judgement.
>
>Bill Pearce
>
>
>< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
>< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
>< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|