Subject: | Re: [OM] E-1 first impressions |
---|---|
From: | Moose <olymoose@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Wed, 05 Nov 2003 20:09:46 -0800 |
I quite agree, just wanted to make sure that magnification and coverage
weren't being confused.
Moose Earl Dunbar wrote: Moose, I don't know. When what you see is a (relatively) tiny image, especially surrounded by lots of "empty" space (which was exactly my perception of the E-1 finder), I find it difficult to imagine myself composing creatively. There is something about a viewfinder that "fills the eyespace". It communicates spatial relationships properly, connecting the scene with the eye/brain. Maybe I just need to get out and try it, maybe I'd be surprised. But esp. after using OMs for so long, and 120 and 4x5, it's going to be a tough sell. < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] How durable is a shoe4?, Moose |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] E-1 first impressions, Moose |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] E-1 first impressions, Earl Dunbar |
Next by Thread: | [OM] Oly C5060 1 first impressions ?, Titoy |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |