I think that Brian meant that the user was using the 21/2 on the OM-3.
>
>Subject: Re: [OM] E-1 first impressions
> From: "Earl Dunbar" <edunbar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Wed, 05 Nov 2003 17:02:28 -0500
> To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>A 21 f2 just a silly millimeter shorter...
>
>*********** REPLY SEPARATOR ***********
>
>On 11/6/2003 at 10:57 AM Brian Swale wrote:
>
>>BD wrote
>>> The damn cameras fell apart. I've
>>> heard something very similar today from one of the world's outstanding
>>> documentary photographers, who uses an OM3 and 20 f2 - and Canon F-1
>>> with longer lenses. He LOVES the 20 f2, but complains that he beats the
>>> bodies to death.
>>
>> What is a 20 f2 ??
>>
>>Brian
>>
>>< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
>>< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
>>< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
>
>
>
>
>
>< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
>< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
>< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|