Hi Boris
You're welcome old bean. I find it easier to scan slides, but that
might be merely because Vuescan has more profiles for non-Kodak slide
films than for print films. Nonetheless I scan both types of film.
And Ed Hamrick advises his customers to set Vuescan to a Kodak
equivalent if the proprietary profile is not in the list in Vuescan.
I use almost exclusively Fuji and Ilford films: Fuji Superia or Reala
for print, Provia for slide; SFX Pan F, FP4 and HP5 for mono print. I
have tried the new Tri-X from Kodak. I like ISO 100, 200 and 400 print
films. However, as Moose so elegantly puts it, it is indeed
distressing when your sharp 6x4" print expands to a slightly blurred or
out-of-focus englargement.
[" WOW" when I worked on the Eurofighter project, some engineers told
me that the switches in the undercarriage were "weight _off_ wheels";
the difference was, apparently , quite important. ;-)]
Chris
On Friday, Oct 24, 2003, at 12:52 Europe/London, Boris Grigorov wrote:
WOW Moose, WOW*.
This is what I have to say. Thank you for the complete explanation.
So you and Chris are telling me that I suddenly started to worry about
nothing. Just another bug from the list-slides, slides, your images
are not worth if they are shot on anything else.
<|_:-)_|>
C M I Barker
Cambridgeshire, Great Britain.
+44 (0)7092 251126
ftog at threeshoes.co.uk
http://www.threeshoes.co.uk
http://homepage.mac.com/zuiko
... a nascent photo library.
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|