Thanks .... sorry about the HTML format; I had switched for a particular email
off-list, and forgot to switch back.
*********** REPLY SEPARATOR ***********
On 10/24/2003 at 10:02 AM Danrich wrote:
>Canon FS2710, Nikon LS-4000, Minolta 5400.
>Also your letter in HTML format
>Xdan
>
>
>This may have been covered before I joined the list; if so, sorry, and
>feel free to reply off list.
>
>I foresee myself continuing to mostly shoot film rather than digital for
>some time, not unlike a lot of others here. So, what scanners are
>people using, recommend, etc.? My requirements are mostly for 35mm, BUT
>I do have a need for up to 4x5 scans. I suppose my 2-1/4 and 4x5
>material could be jobbed out, but then I'm forced to find a good service
>for that, not to mention the relative cost vs. just buying a 4x5-capable
>scanner and doing it inhouse.
>
>Should I be looking at two scanners, one optimized for 35mm and one for
>larger? Assuming that scanners capable of the larger formats are going
>to be much more expensive, what is the advisability of buying used?
>
>My use of the scanned images would be:
>1. Web gallery
>2. Prints up to 16x20
>TIA,
>
>Earl
>
>
>< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
>< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
>< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|