Thanks for clarifying my misinformation Walt. I guess those Laws of Optical
Physics can only be bent not broken.
Charlie
-----Original Message-----
From: Walt Wayman [mailto:hiwayman@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2003 2:12 PM
To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [OM] Re: 35 Shift
Those numbers, while not intentionally misleading, are still often
misleading. The "field of view" of the 35mm shift is 83 degrees,
but that refers to the image circle around which you may wander in
shifting the lens while composing the final shot, which will
cover -- anyone? anyone? -- yes, 63 degrees, like a normal 35mm
lens.
Just to be sure, I have, moments before writing this, compared the
field of view of a 35 shift with a 35/2. They are identical.
Walt
_____________________________________________________________
"Patriotism means being loyal to your country all the time
and to its government when it deserves it." -- Mark Twain
---------- Original Message ----------------------------------
From: Geilfuss Charles <Charles.Geilfuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2003 12:59:59 -0500
>Greetings Peter,
>Sounds like a great trip and I look forward to seeing some of your
>scanned images. Regarding the 35 Shift: mind you I've never
>actually used one of these lenses, but according to the
>Unofficial OM Sales Info File, the 35 Shift has a practical field
>of view of 83 degrees which is more akin to a 24mm lens instead
>of the usual 63 degree field of view of a typical 35mm lens. You
>may find it more to your satisfaction than you realise. Another
>plus, it's about one third the cost of the rare and lofty 24
>Shift.
>
>Charlie Geilfuss
>
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|